![ink blot test name ink blot test name](https://wallpapersboom.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/4352_rorschach.jpg)
Hill did not put in her report that Norris might be a past or future child molester – no psychological test has the power to determine that. The Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach (1884-1922). When someone is intentionally or unintentionally suppressing other sides of their personality, the Rorschach might be the only assessment to raise a red flag. As a postgraduate student, Hill had learned a rule of thumb that she had repeatedly seen confirmed in practice: a troubled personality can often keep it together on an IQ test and other standard tests, then fall apart when faced with the inkblots. Crucially, it’s a visual task, so it can sometimes get around conscious strategies of self-presentation. It’s a strange and open-ended task, in which it is not at all clear what the inkblots are supposed to be, or how you’re expected to respond to them.
#Ink blot test name free
Even more revealing than the specific things he had seen in the inkblots was the fact that he had felt free to say them. On the Rorschach, his persona broke down. He knew how he wanted to come across in interviews and what kind of bland answers to give on the other tests. He was perfectly aware that he was undergoing an evaluation. If nothing else, the Rorschach test had prompted Norris to show a side of himself he did not otherwise let show. As Hill expected, her calculations showed Norris’s scores to be as extreme as his answers. She then calculated the formulas that would turn all those scores into psychological judgments: dominant personality style, egocentricity index, flexibility of thinking index, the suicide constellation. She systematically assigned Norris’s responses the various codes of the standard method and categorised his answers as typical or unusual using the long lists in the manual. Hill politely sent him on his way – he left her office with a firm handshake and a smile, looking her straight in the eye – then she turned to the legal pad on her desk, with the record of his responses. Norris’s answers were shocking: elaborate, violent sexual scenes with children parts of the inkblots seen as females being punished or destroyed. Different people see different things.”Īfter he had responded to all 10 cards, Hill went back for a second pass: “Now I’m going to read back what you said, and I want you to show me where you saw it.” No time limit, no instructions about how many responses he should give. For this test, Norris was asked not to tell a story, not to describe what he felt, but simply to say what he saw. As she handed him each card, she said: “What might this be?”, or “What do you see?”įive of the cards were in black and white, two had red shapes as well, and three were multicoloured.
![ink blot test name ink blot test name](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/90/7a/9d/907a9df72fa1b840a7eb14b251d8dd76.jpg)
#Ink blot test name series
She took out a yellow legal pad and a thick folder, and handed him, one by one, a series of 10 cardboard cards from the folder, each with a symmetrical blot on it.
![ink blot test name ink blot test name](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61zXnQrLIsL._AC_SX679_.jpg)
At the end of the second afternoon, Hill asked Norris to move from the desk to a low chair near the couch in her office.